kconfiggroup and unhandled types

[Thiago Macieira]

Em Monday 29 October 2007 05:20:34 Aaron J. Seigo escreveu:
> were there specific reasons for using kFatal that warrant keeping it that
> way?

I agree that kWarning is probably better.

If you're debugging your code and you want to fix your warnings, do this:

	export QT_FATAL_WARNINGS=1

This will generate core dumps when a warning is triggered. The same behaviour 
as a kFatal, that is.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071029/440343c5/attachment.sig>