[RFC] KConfig API stuff

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:17:56PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> "undirty" sounds weird, but immediately rings a bell with anybody who
>> knows something about writeback semantics. deal?
>
> "discardDirtyEntries"?
>
yeah. well. it sounds a bit like dirty entries would be discarded
alltogether, like reading them again would return defaults or something.
i also thought about "unpersist", but that's about the same.
discardWrites is again like rollback. inhibitWriteout is close, but it
suggests it might also affect future writes. cancelPendingWriteouts ...
is that really better? i'm running out of ideas ...

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.