libkdeprint

[Thomas Zander]

On Tuesday 16 October 2007 01:53:55 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Commnents/yes/no?
>
> From okular's point of view, no.

Simply objecting without giving alternate solutions doesn't help the open 
discussion. What do you have in mind as an alternate solution?

In other words; Do you have a suggestion on how to solve the HUGE problem that 
we have a LOT of code rotting on KDELibs that we have to maintain BC for the 
next couple of years?

I offered a solution for the Okular problem (talk to Cups directly), what is 
wrong with that solution?

Thank you for being constructive! :)
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071016/90b06818/attachment.sig>