kdelibs (at least) : test building by default

[Sebastian Kügler]

On Tuesday 09 October 2007 15:30:40 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Tuesday 09 October 2007 15:20:21 Sebastian Kügler escreveu:
> > How about requiring "no regressions in unit tests" for patches to be
> > submitted? That makes sense to me at this point. Just enabling unit tests
> > in the build doesn't solve any problem (other than the barrier is then
> > lowered to actually *run* them and consider the results).
>
> Uh... that's a VERY difficult thing to ask people. At most, they run the
> tests that are related to their code. Running all tests for every single
> small change will put many people off...

Well, yes. That should be within the bounds of what's reasonable. For example, 
changing stuff in KConfig should not cause regressions in the KConfig unit 
tests. If other areas are suspicious, it would be nice to have them tested as 
well.
-- 
sebas

 http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |  GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071009/eaa4c6a3/attachment.sig>