kdesupport/soprano/includes

[Christian Ehrlicher]

Sebastian Trüg schrieb:
> On Friday 05 October 2007 18:46:37 Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>> Sebastian Trüg schrieb:
>>> On Friday 05 October 2007 18:35:16 Rafael Fernández López wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> This is crazy ! the thread splitted in different lists...
>>>>
>>>> El Friday 05 October 2007 17:43:59 Christian Ehrlicher escribió:
>>>>> Jarosław Staniek schrieb:
>>>>>> Rafael Fernández López said the following, On 2007-10-05 15:47:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right. At the moment on include folder I have soprano and Soprano
>>>>>>> folders installed. This will fail on windows... at least I think
>>>>>>> so...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any input from windows systems ?
>>>>>> How about libsoprano/ ?
>>>> Sebastian ? What do you think ?
>>> I think it is a little ugly.
>>>
>>>>> I still don't understand why you need include/soprano (file) at all -
>>>>> either you use a subdir and put *all* your files into your you don't...
>>>> Sebastian ? ^^
>>> I don't get it. I use a subdir with all files in it. The problem is that
>>> I have two subdirs: one with the standard includes such as "statement.h"
>>> and one with the "nice" includes such as "Statement". Once is called
>>> "soprano" and the other one "Soprano". That is the problem since Windows
>>> apparently still does not take case into account in file management.
>>> Maybe one solution would be to add yet another folder layer and add it to
>>> the include path in FindSoprano.cmake:
>>>        soprano/niceincludes/Soprano
>>> or something like that.
>>>
>>> Or we just plain remove the nice includes. :(
>> Ok, now I understand - I thought one of them is a file.
>> Then I prefer soprano and soprano-devel (or whatever those files are for)
> 
> soprano-devel? Which one? The standard includes?
> 
I'm not a soprano devs :)

I think for someone who wants to use soprano it's hard to learn when he 
has to use <Soprano/..> or <soprano/..> - so another naming would be 
fine. As I'm not a soprano dev I don't know of any good name for the 
second, (afaik) not so important header-dir.

Christian



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071005/fa9d317b/attachment.sig>