[PATCH] make ksnapshot increment the last number

[Jos Poortvliet]

On 10/4/07, Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/3/07, Tobias G. Pfeiffer <tgpfeiffer at web.de> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Tuesday 02 October 2007, 14:58, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > > On 10/2/07, Thomas Zander <zander at kde.org> wrote:
> > > > Got a bugreport/mailthread with those complaints and their usecases?
> > > > I'd be interrested to know what those that complained of increasing the
> > > > last digits were doing/thinking :)
> > >
> > > Indeed, I can't think of any reason why one would want that - unless
> > > you use some silly date-scheme like DD-MM-YYYY ;-)
> >
> > But, even then, why would one want to have increased the day when creating
> > subsequent screenshots? I cannot imagine a situation where this
> > date-increasing behaviour is the reason people wanted the first instead of
> > the last number to be incremented.
>
> Well, then, the already rare scenario I described is even rarer - only
> a daily desktop screenshot blogger would ever enjoy this ;-)
>
> Maybe riccardo (nice work btw) should make the patch do this:
> - when no date is found, increment the last number
> - when a date is found, don't increment it, but add a -x number to it...
- of course, if there already is a -x number, increment it ;-)

> I think that makes most sense. Sounds rather easy, too.
>
> > Bye
> > Tobias
> >
> > PS. Except maybe the "my daily desktop screenshot" blogger :-)
> >
> > --
> > follow the penguin...
> >
> >
>