gcc -Woverloaded-virtual

[André Wöbbeking]

On Monday 26 November 2007, David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 26 November 2007, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > David Faure wrote:
> > >> I am afraid this will lead to problems if one is overloaded and
> > >> not the other.
> > >
> > > ... which is exactly what the -Woverloaded-virtual warning will
> > > detect :-)
> >
> > I mean, what happens if addSubjob(KJob*) is overloaded, but not
> > addSubjob(KJob*, bool)? I don't think -Woverloaded-virtual will
> > notice any problem.
>
> Yes it will, it's exactly what the warning is about: reimplementing a
> virtual method which has overloads and not reimplementing the
> overloads.

Not really. AFAIK it's about broken reimplementation caused by wrong 
signature. At least the base class doesn't need overloads of a virtual 
method to trigger the warning.