changing KGraphicsUtils?

[Thomas Zander]

On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:47:13 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Given what I expect to be in there, I think I would prefer creating a
> second namespace if we get to that point :-). But that's me.

Hmm, that argument kind of goes against your previous reasoning to rename 
the namespace.

I'd like to keep it to graphicsUtils; its not a mismatch as colors are 
certainly a part of graphics utils. And I personally don't see the 
requirement to have image manipulations in there to warrent the usage of 
the namespace.


-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070531/f5840ffd/attachment.sig>