kprocess, kpty & kdesu
ossi at kde.org
Wed May 2 21:00:54 BST 2007
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:52:53PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >- it is pretty much conceivable that other sequential devices want to be
> > wrapped, too (i'm pretty sure i'd find some examples if i scanned the
> > kde codebase (*)). so why not go for a generic solution?
> The generic solution is QIODevice itself, no?
i thought about it, i read the code. short answer: no. if it wasn't so,
qprocess and qabstractsocket wouldn't have a hundred+ lines of buffering
code each. i guess the trolls should consider creating QSequentialIODevice,
but i don't count on it in this decade. ;-P
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
More information about the kde-core-devel