CLucene version for strigi should be =0.9.16 ?

[Thomas Zander]

On Thursday 22 March 2007 20:37, Leo Savernik wrote:
> How about incorporating a local copy of clucene (which can optionally be
> turned off or instructed to use the system-wide clucene at configure time)?
> Wouldn't be the first time in KDE-land.

I guess when there is  tarball release of strigi this becomes important, but I 
don't think that at this time it is.

Is there an open communication with the clucene people to make it safe for 
binary compatibility ?
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070323/110c3c9d/attachment.sig>