/tags/unmaintained (was: RFC: KSplash in KDE4)

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:01:10PM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Saturday, 17. March 2007, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > So what do you need the /3 vs /4 for then?
> >
> > because if was trashed from trunk, you would need to relate it with the
> > abandonment time to establish the "technology branch" otherwise.
> 
> Ah right. because the SVN number doesn't tell you that, right?
> 
well, i for one can map only r409xxx to sometime around april 2005 and
know its been kde3 stable. i'm sure you can do the same for every single
other revision, but most of us can't. ;)

> So when its /3, it was either abandoned during KDE 3.0, KDE 3.1, KDE
> 3.2, KDE 3.3, KDE 3.4, KDE 3.5 or somewhen later. 
> 
> Great information. 
> 
i think this information is perfectly sufficient. why would you want
more? if you revive it, you'll do it against the latest version from
that branch or will port it to the most current branch anyway (in which
case the branch number you can see gives you a hint about the effort
involved).

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.