/tags/unmaintained (was: RFC: KSplash in KDE4)

[David Faure]

On Friday 16 March 2007, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 16. März 2007 schrieb Lubos Lunak:
> > > > KDE is the minimum version needed to build it (for released-with-KDE
> > > > apps, svn log can tell which version they came from). This last
> > > > requirement negates the need for a 3/4 separation.
> > >
> > > Does anyone oppose to this change to the policy?
> >
> >  I've already moved ksplashml to unmaintained/4 . And I think it actually
> > makes sense to have such a separation. Imagine we had this since KDE2 -
> > with a flat hierarchy /tags/unmaintained would be now cluttered with apps
> > obsolete beyond repair and one would have to check README's or svn log to
> > see that.
> 
> I completely agree with Lubos.

Me too. There is no such thing as "a kde application". The code is very different
if it was developed using the qt2/kde2, qt3/kde3 or qt4/kde4 API.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).