naming convention for internal methods

[Thomas Zander]

On Friday 16 March 2007 00:48, Richard Moore wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Aaron J. Seigo <aseigo at kde.org> wrote:
> > note that this is, of course, not about legitimate protected: interfaces;
> > this is about stuff that -should- be private or at least not an exported
> > symbol but for whatever reason can't be. in other words, uncommon and
> > exceptional instances.
>
> Perhaps we should look at such cases - after all, how many times
> should a method be marked internal but still visible?

I think looking at them was exactly what aaron was doing. In a generic way. 
But IMOHO not all design discussions need to include all the details when 
those will not effect the outcome.
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070316/481a27db/attachment.sig>