[PATCH] ***FINAL*** API review of KCalendarSystem* and KDate* widgets

[Allen Winter]

On Sunday 22 July 2007 8:40:23 pm John Layt wrote:
> Hi
> 
I'd like to see this patch committed today.
John, you seem very passionate and enthusiastic.
Good to have you here.

-Allen

> 
> With tomorrow being the last day for API changes, its time to decide if the 
> changes are acceptable or not.  If judged OK, then I will need someone to 
> commit for me as I don't have an svn account (yet).  If not, then I'll move 
> onto cleaning up the calendar implementations, and look to put the widgets 
> into playground.
> 
> Please remember that these API changes are just a first step, that some of the 
> new implementations are not 100% yet, and that I will continue to work on the 
> implementations, unit tests, and apidox over the next couple of weeks.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> John.
> 
> P.S. Quick question, pardon my ignorance on C++ & BIC, but does re-arranging 
> the order of methods in the header change the virtual table?  I want a more 
> logical grouping of methods for the apidox, but doing so now makes the 
> patches very hard to review.
> 
> --
> 
> 



-- 
KDEPIM Developer
I accept PayPal payments to awinterz at earthlink.net