Can Q_GLOBAL_STATIC replace KStaticDelete ?

[Matthias Kretz]

OK, I'm open for suggestions how to do it without q_atomic_test_and_set_ptr. 
For my use cases it wouldn't need to be thread safe...

On Wednesday 17 January 2007 17:52, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> You used q_atomic_test_and_set_ptr in your code. This QAtomic code is the
> whole reason why Q_GLOBAL_STATIC isn't documented right now: all of the
> atomic code isn't documented.
>
> Using Q_GLOBAL_STATIC is already risky, but if we get a promise it won't
> change (and it probably won't), we can use it. But using the low-level
> atomic methods may be even more of a problem...

-- 
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                            <><
http://Vir.homelinux.org/
MatthiasKretz at gmx.net, kretz at kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz at urz.uni-heidelberg.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070117/1e6bcd20/attachment.sig>