Normalizing signals and slots

jos poortvliet jos at
Sat Jan 13 23:44:42 GMT 2007

Op zondag 14 januari 2007, schreef Matt Rogers:
> On Saturday 13 January 2007 5:02 pm, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Dissabte 13 Gener 2007 23:21, Rafael Fernández López va escriure:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I remember an email talking about the benefits of having signals and
> > > slots normalized when using them, since on Qt code it is first checked
> > > if normalized, and if not it goes for normalizing it, so it is more
> > > cheap having it normalized.
> > >
> > > I propose a day (maybe more) for normalizing all signals and slots on
> > > the KDE project.
> > >
> > > What you think ?
> >
> > Writing a ebn test for that would seem to be a good idea.
> I disagree. Normalizing signals and slots doesn't make that much of a real
> difference in terms of speed. We don't gain that much by doing it for more
> than kdelibs and parts of kdebase.

now i'm of course not qualified to comment on this, but i wonder - how much 
work is it? i mean, maybe it's not worth changing stuff for, but it could be 
part of coding guidelines?



Alles wat ik doe denk en zeg is gebaseerd op het wereldbeeld wat ik nu heb. 
Ik ben niet verantwoordelijk voor wijzigingen van de wereld, of het beeld wat 
ik daarvan heb, noch voor de daaruit voortvloeiende gedragingen van mezelf. 
Alles wat ik zeg is aardig bedoeld, tenzij expliciet vermeld.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list