Can Q_GLOBAL_STATIC replace KStaticDelete ?

Matthias Kretz kretz at kde.org
Tue Jan 9 20:10:29 GMT 2007


On Tuesday 09 January 2007 20:31, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Yes: by defining the order in which they are constructed.

So if I were using Q_GLOBAL_STATIC instead of KStaticDeleter my 
Phonon::Factory would be destructed before Qt's allObjects is gone. One 
problem fixed (though without a guarantee that it works on other platforms 
and keeps working like this?).

But it still doesn't help with dirty KConfig objects that need a KInstance on 
destruction.

-- 
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                            <><
http://Vir.homelinux.org/
MatthiasKretz at gmx.net, kretz at kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz at urz.uni-heidelberg.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070109/b20ed91d/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list