organizing kdebase

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On February 22, 2007, Richard Moore wrote:
> I think the issue here is more that non-KDE applications that use
> these tools to integrate into KDE should be able to depend on them to
> be present.

that's why they are in kdebase, and not in kdebase/apps or kdebase/workspace.

perhaps "tools" is a better word than "utils" here then; "utils" seems to 
imply "miscelaneous crud" which isn't true. nor was that my intention with 
this grouping.

keeping runtime/ to mean "those applications which form the runtime 
requirements of KDE applications" seems to be a good separate goal to me for 
reasons i've already stated.

would runtime/ and tools/ be more palatable, or is that just arranging deck 
chairs?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

Full time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070222/b3505f0a/attachment.sig>