Closing all bugs?

[Jordi]

On Dec 18, 2007 10:58 AM, Randy Kramer <rhkramer at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Monday 17 December 2007 03:15 pm, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Monday 17 December 2007, David Faure wrote:
> > > Yes, this is very important given the very common "Version:
> > > unspecified". Any idea how to do this technically, adding the keyword
> > > to all kde3 bugs? Do we even have keyword support in our current
> > > bugzilla version, or were you thinking about bugzilla 3 there? If so,
> > > we can't really "tag them now", can we?
> >
> > The tag should be easily changeable, I think. Otherwise what will we do
> > with bugs that were reported for KDE3, but were verified and found that
> > they are still present in KDE4? I think the sanest solution is
> > to "advance" (tag) them to KDE4.
>
> At the point that KDE4 is released, such bugs are valid bugs for both KDE3
> and
> KDE4, so one approach would be to apply both KDE3 and KDE4 tags.  Changing
> the tag from KDE3 to KDE4 loses information.
>

If they are not going to be fixed in KDE3 (and the subject of this mail can
give an idea of how much effort the people is willing to spend on the "old"
kde3 base code), it would be better to just advance them to KDE4.


-- 
Jordi Polo Carres
Natural language processing laboratory
NAIST
http://www.bahasara.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20071219/ae7132fe/attachment.htm>