Making kdefx static
Matthew Woehlke
mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net
Fri Aug 3 22:20:48 BST 2007
(meh, forget quoting)
Ok, summary so far:
Thiago says we can't have a static kdefx. But we can't have a dynamic
kdefx either. So I guess winterz is right; we can't have kdefx :-). I'll
see what else transpires over the weekend, and plan to start a 'kdefx
going away' thread on Monday (along with a 'please stop using it before
then!' plea ;-) - I'll clean up everything I can but I'm gone
Thursday-Sunday next week).
Tom objected to blitz in kdelibs. If we kill kdefx, this is of course
right out as both he and winterz have pointed out, plus I agree with his
other arguments (about the code being unproven). So I think the question
here is, should we still consider adding blitz to kdesupport as a crutch
for applications that would really feel the pain otherwise?
--
Matthew
"Non sequitor. Your facts are out of order." -- Nomad
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list