KConfigSkeleton::usrWriteConfig()

[Thomas Zander]

On Sunday 22 April 2007 12:21, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> Is there any reason why this was done? The usrWriteConfig() function
> was supposed to be a hook for customizations, not a function doing
> vital stuff. Any objections to reverting that change?

Just a thought; can you call the  KConfigSkeleton::usrWriteConfig()  from 
your method ?
Which is IMO the common way to extend (virtual) methods.

-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070422/317254f3/attachment.sig>