FW: [REMINDER] Upcoming KDE 4.0 Milestones + Nepomuk

[Christian Ehrlicher]

Von: David Faure <faure at kde.org>
> On Thursday 12 April 2007, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 April 2007, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > i also think that holding nepomuk to the same freeze schedule and
> > > > standards as kdecore, kdeui, kio may be unrealistic at any point.
> > > > by delaying to 4.1 my concern is that all we'll achieve is delaying
> > > > it's maturity and, due to the likeliehood of low application uptake
> > > > (see my reply to dirk for more on that if you wish/need it) the
> > > > odds are high that the version in 4.1 wouldn't be much more proven
> > > > than a version in 4.0.
> > >
> > > Couldn't we just release it with kdelibs as a framework marked
> > > "experimental"? There may be other candidates for that status, too.
> > 
> > I disagree with this. People will still use it and complain after.
> Too bad for them.
> 
> > I propose kdeextragear-libs
> This doesn't sound like a good place for a lib that the main kde modules
> are going to need;
> extragear is typically compiled -after- the main kde modules.
> 
I've no objections against nepomuk in kdelibs as long as it works fine on win32 or is made optional.
Current win32 problems (tested two weeks ago):
- rcgen does not work correct (afaics a problem somewhere deep inside librdf - tested with librdf <= 1.04 )
- rcgen is created on cmake time (because it creats sources needed for cmake) - this is more a common problem and should be avoided by a dummy source file or something similar

Christian
-- 
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail