FW: [REMINDER] Upcoming KDE 4.0 Milestones + Nepomuk

[Andras Mantia]

On Wednesday 11 April 2007, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > i also think that holding nepomuk to the same freeze schedule and
> > standards as kdecore, kdeui, kio may be unrealistic at any point.
> > by delaying to 4.1 my concern is that all we'll achieve is delaying
> > it's maturity and, due to the likeliehood of low application uptake
> > (see my reply to dirk for more on that if you wish/need it) the
> > odds are high that the version in 4.1 wouldn't be much more proven
> > than a version in 4.0.
>
> Couldn't we just release it with kdelibs as a framework marked
> "experimental"? There may be other candidates for that status, too.

I disagree with this. People will still use it and complain after.

I propose kdeextragear-libs and separate KDE3 and KDE4 applications in 
extragear.

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20070412/524432fc/attachment.sig>