FW: [REMINDER] Upcoming KDE 4.0 Milestones + Nepomuk

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Wed Apr 11 16:50:30 BST 2007


On 11.04.07 17:27:18, Sebastian TrĂ¼g wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 April 2007 15:18:44 Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 10. April 2007, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > I'll take a look on this in the next two weeks but it would be nice to
> > > > make it optional until 4.1.
> > >
> > > this would realistically mean application integration in 4.2 or later.
> >
> > No. There can be applications making use of nepomuk by 4.1, and then we can
> > include a polished and tested version of it in kdelibs for 4.1.
> >
> > if we put nepomuik into kdelibs for KDE 4.0, then we have to stay
> > compatible with it (also binary compatibility).
> 
> that is actually a good point. So far not many people besides me have used the 
> API for real. That is not the best situation for an API freeze.

Well, in the thread on the release-team list it was said that a binary
incompatible 4.1 release is not completely out of question.
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-release-team&m=117319674501772&w=2

Andreas

-- 
You plan things that you do not even attempt because of your extreme caution.




More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list