Features for the new bugzilla?

[Thomas Zander]

On Friday 8 September 2006 18:22, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >I second that, keywords would be especially useful for
> > "cross-sectional" issues like usability, accessbility or
> > internationalization. Basically everywhere where assigning to a
> > single component is not enough.
>
> And since we're on it, I'd like to see the Version: item split in two:
>
> Version found
> Version fixed (or target to be fixed)

This, together with various other extentions proposed in this thread mean 
more work and more complexity for the app-maintainers.
I see most bugs which should be closed as 'notabug' or 'wontfix', judging 
from comment being closed with normal status 'fixed'.  App-maintainers 
don't care, bugreporters don't care.

Elsewhere on this thread a request was made to make bugzilla more friendly 
for reporters. Adding more data on screen and adding more status fields 
has the opposite effect.

If any changes have to be made; I'd say it has to be in the direction of 
simplicity.
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060908/ce0489a6/attachment.sig>