David Faure faure at kde.org
Wed Sep 6 11:10:36 BST 2006

On Tuesday 05 September 2006 23:47, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:05:19AM +0200, David Faure wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 September 2006 09:02, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > In the end the distributed tarball should contain a complete
> > > version, else my educated guess is that distro's will complain. 
> >
> > I don't see why. kdelibs/licenses/BSD is a very clear reference to a
> > license.
> > 
> i think you should learn from your past mistakes in dealing with
> licensing subtleties. ;-)
> bottom line is, if rms(*) says it's not enough, then it isn't enough.
> and guess what? he did ...

Hmm? Do you see the full definition of the LGPL in kapplication.h?
I don't. I only see a reference to it.

What is different about the BSD license that makes it mandatory to repeat it in full in every file?

David Faure, faure at kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list