KDE/kdelibs/cmake/modules

[David Faure]

On Tuesday 05 September 2006 23:47, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:05:19AM +0200, David Faure wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 September 2006 09:02, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > In the end the distributed tarball should contain a complete
> > > version, else my educated guess is that distro's will complain. 
> >
> > I don't see why. kdelibs/licenses/BSD is a very clear reference to a
> > license.
> > 
> i think you should learn from your past mistakes in dealing with
> licensing subtleties. ;-)
> bottom line is, if rms(*) says it's not enough, then it isn't enough.
> and guess what? he did ...

Hmm? Do you see the full definition of the LGPL in kapplication.h?
I don't. I only see a reference to it.

What is different about the BSD license that makes it mandatory to repeat it in full in every file?

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).