faure at kde.org
Tue Sep 5 20:50:32 BST 2006
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 20:05, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 September 2006 10:05, David Faure wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 September 2006 09:02, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > If it is a general discussion, we
> > > should add a COPYING-CMAKE or something to each module (similar to
> > > COPYING-DOCS which was added recently).
> > I don't see why. All other source files have their license within, and
> > cmake source files can do just the same. Docs are different due to syntax
> > issues I guess.
> But this means again to include the full license in every cmake script, or do
> I misunderstand ?
"A license or a reference to the license", I meant.
After all the files under [L]GPL don't have the full text of the [L]GPL, they only refer to it.
Surely we can do the same for files under the BSD license, no?
> Once they are installed, kdelibs/license/BSD doesn't say a lot anymore, then
> it would have to be prefix/share/licenses/BSD or something like this I think.
Well, we could use a websvn url instead then :)
> the first two lines have to fit some pattern
> > No idea about no-endorsement clause. Seems irrelevant for a project the
> > size of kde...
> Why ?
Would someone really use the name of a cmake-module contributor to
endorse or promote code that it compiles? Doesn't make sense to me.
"Microsoft Office, with contributions from Alex Neundorf in a file that
is used to compile our source code"... !?
David Faure, faure at kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
More information about the kde-core-devel