[Fwd: Licensing Policy for non-code?]

[Clarence Dang]

On Wednesday 18 October 2006 00:40, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 6:53, Clarence Dang wrote:
> > On Monday 16 October 2006 09:59, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > I personally think we should settle on a set of Creative Commons
> > licenses.
>
> once they are (with CCv3 afaik) compatible with the GPL, i agree.
> until then we're sort of stuck with the LGPL.

But why does it matter whether icons are GPL compatible?  You're never linking 
or deriving code from icons except for the tricky #include <x.xpm> case.

-- 
Clarence Dang

Blog - http://clarencedang.blogspot.com/
KolourPaint - http://www.kolourpaint.org/
Uni - http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~clarenced/