l.savernik at aon.at
Fri Nov 17 18:54:10 GMT 2006
Am Freitag, 17. November 2006 13:41 schrieb Thomas Zander:
> Overloading a concept like a viewer with editing functionality just
> distorts the mental model of the way things work and it doesn't help the
> huge percentage of those users that has no need to edit and _just_ want to
> view the page.
Where actually did anybody state that kviewshell can edit document content?
They talked about editing metadata, but even konqueror (the universal
*viewer*) supports editing metadata in a limited way -- think renaming
Hence, kviewshell is a viewer with abilities that make it easier and more
powerful to use. I don't see it as a usability crime to provide the user with
a list of pages to check for printing as the user is skimming through them
instead of having to remember or jotting down the page ranges he wants to
print, only to enter the page range into the print-dialog afterwards.
Second, providing improvements that enable proficient users to get their work
done cannot lead to rule out those applications for default inclusion only
because the "you are your user users" won't make any use of those
More information about the kde-core-devel