Announcing the merge of the kdelibs4-dbus branch
Ralf Habacker
ralf.habacker at freenet.de
Mon May 29 21:35:19 BST 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thiago Macieira schrieb:
> Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> Thiago Macieira schrieb:
>>> Paulo Jorge Guedes wrote:
>>>> Thanks for your work Thiago.
>>>>
>>>> One question. Will kdelibs depend on kdesupport, because of QtDBus?
>>>> It doesn't make much sense to me and it's enough for me having to
>>>> deal already with kdewin32 lib :)
>>> Yes. And on the D-BUS library as well.
>> are you refering to the client library only or the the whole server ?
>> It it currently not clear where the win32 port of dbus will live.
>
> Both. The server daemon is actually a wrapper around the client library,
> with a few extra functions (the org.freedesktop.DBus interface).
>
> The Windows port should live in the freedesktop.org CVS, along with the
> Unix port. I see no reason to keep it separate.
The only issue i see is that the dbus people has targeted the win32 port
to release 1.2
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2006-April/004620.html. The
current release is 0.6.1. 1.2 will be somewhere in the not so near
future i guess :-(
If kdelibs trunk will have dbus support, people will ask for dbus for
win32 and it will be very hard to track changes without having dbus
win32 sources complete in cvs or svn.
The choice I see would be
1. to have a specific branch in the freedesktop cvs or if the dbus
people does not like this
2. to place dbus-win32 sources temporary in the kde svn may be kdesupport ?
Any comments ?
Ralf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEe0O8oHh+5t8EXncRAtr/AJ4lTB/FGTW+PYOuOOpJkuClrj/gBACeM77i
nw58CINIKCYv8S1SAA8laHo=
=LHoI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list