[RFC] Solid and use of namespaces

[Krzysztof Lichota]

Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Opinions are welcome, in particular I'd like to have reactions regarding:
> 3) Class naming in those namespaces? for example should I go for 
> Power::Manager or Power::PowerManager? That's the main reason why I'm asking 
> for comments, it'll have an impact on the ease of use of those classes.

Definitely "PowerManager". Using generic names ("Manager") makes it
harder to grep for name, replace it with other, find it using filtering
by class names, etc.

	Krzysztof Lichota


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060521/e51da2d1/attachment.sig>