kdereview/extragear procedure

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Tuesday 28 March 2006 12:50, Will Stephenson wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 March 2006 20:59, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > give the number of people not on the extragear list, it may make sense to
> > also announce it on kde-core-devel. for instance, i'm not on the keg list
> > (and i don't want to be), but i'll be helping ensure that the HCI team
> > keeps abreast of these developments so proper UI reviews can start to
> > happen for KDE4. announcing it clearly here on k-c-d would help me do
> > that.
>
> Is it time to extend the official definition of k-c-d then?  For core
> modules, fine, but adding another role to k-c-d just makes the list harder
> to read. IMO the existing guidelines for extragear are adequate - all

if extragear takes a more prominent role in kde application release 
management, then it's probably not adequate, no. if it remains a place for 
3rd party apps that just happen to use kde's support infrastructure, then 
probably.

but for apps looking to become part of the official KDE project universe of 
applications, i think it's fairly useful to be kept abreast here. it's not 
like apps are added daily.

> that's missing are a developer.kde.org page placing them in context of
> 'Ways in which your app can be a part of KDE' and a dot article drawing
> attention to this.  For HIC scrutiny, isn't kde-announce a sufficient
> medium?

are the HIG people on kde-announce? *waits for answer*

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

Full time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060329/9190d1dd/attachment.sig>