Quality checks (again)

[Thiago Macieira]

Waldo Bastian wrote:
>> I think this could be an "extra item": applications that do intend to
>> be used in a KIOSK environment would get a "KIOSK-certified"
>> seal/award/stamp/whatever and would document what can and cannot be
>> locked down. This also means the authors accept bugs for failing to
>> comply to the KIOSK settings.
>
>That would work.

It would in turn allow sysadmins to more easily know which applications 
they can let users use and which they have to put additional restrictions 
on (executable bits, ACLs or completely uninstall).
-- 
Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  thiago.macieira (AT) trolltech.com     Trolltech AS
    GPG: 0x6EF45358                   |  Sandakerveien 116,
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C          |  NO-0402
    966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358          |  Oslo, Norway
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060320/aff58dec/attachment.sig>