DRAFT document on coding conventions in kde libraries

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Sunday 05 March 2006 11:19, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
>  QPL and Artistic are not GPL-compatible, so we start again the license
>  discussion, as with CPL.

as understand it: this is fine for applications, however, that are linking to 
our LGPL'd libs or Qt under the QPL. it's a bit different with the CPL which 
was about a library under that license that applications would then link to.

>  So no new KDE4 application should use such licenses (or any other
>  non-GPL-compatible license).

it should be discouraged, i think, simply from the license proliferation 
perspective.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

Full time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060306/a7cb388a/attachment.sig>