cmake and progress reporting

[William A. Hoffman]

At 03:30 AM 6/16/2006, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>>so can somebody with access to a build farm please test current cmake
>> cvs HEAD which features progress reporting and measure whether it slows
>> down parallel builds ?
>
>Here are the results.
>
>3 times with cmake 2.4.2 (no progress reporting):
>530.02user 109.99system 13:19.17elapsed 80%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 
>0maxresident)k
>539.02user 149.10system 18:03.99elapsed 63%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 
>0maxresident)k
>528.20user 110.76system 13:00.81elapsed 81%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 
>0maxresident)k
>build succeeded in all 3 attempts
>
>With cmake CVS (with progress reporting):
>426.31user 108.78system 11:34.65elapsed 77%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 
>0maxresident)k
>
>But the build failed (I tried more than once)

Yikes! It what way did it fail?   That is a bigger problem than
progress slowing down or not....

-Bill