Standalone qt-dbus in kdesupport

Paulo Jorge Guedes Paulo.Guedes at artelecom.pt
Thu Jun 8 19:30:49 BST 2006


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Faure [mailto:faure at kde.org]
> Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Junho de 2006 12:24
> To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
> Subject: Re: Standalone qt-dbus in kdesupport
> 
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:14, Paulo Jorge Guedes wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David Faure [mailto:faure at kde.org]
> > > Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de Junho de 2006 12:08
> > > To: kde-core-devel at kde.org
> > > Subject: Re: Standalone qt-dbus in kdesupport
> > >
> > > On Thursday 08 June 2006 12:15, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > Paulo Jorge Guedes wrote:
> > > > >So, what do you think of
> > > > >
> > > > >--- CMakeLists.txt    (revision 549165)
> > > > >+++ CMakeLists.txt    (working copy)
> > > > >@@ -1 +0,0 @@
> > > > >-ADD_SUBDIRECTORY( qt-dbus )
> > > >
> > > > Huh? Why do you want to disable qt-dbus builds?
> > >
> > > No he wants people to run cmake from within qt-dbus instead of
doing
> > it
> > > for the whole of kdesupport in one go.
> > >
> > > As long as kdesvn-build supports it, I don't mind too much
> > > (right now I install kdesupport into its own prefix, which is a
bit
> > > strange
> > > since it's a collection of unrelated things).
> >
> > Precisely.
> > People can always do cmake ..\kdesupport\qt-dbus in some qt-dbus
build
> > directory but IMHO it would be better if they were forced to (just
like
> > people build kdewin32) because, like David said, it's a collection
of
> > unrelated things.
> 
> But if both are possible in the current situation, then I don't see
the
> point in forcing
> anything upon people...

Then perhaps we should change FindQtDbus.cmake, because it won't find
nothing on windows if one does make install on kdesupport.

Paulo




More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list