kutils/KEdit
Robert Knight
robertknight at gmail.com
Fri Jul 21 15:33:56 BST 2006
Hi,
The only reason I use KEdit from time to time is because it starts up
more quickly than the alternatives (or at least feels quite a bit
quicker) and because it is simple.
If KWrite could start instantaneously, and if the menus could be
simplified a little bit then I wouldn't mind if KEdit was dropped. To
explain what I mean about the menus, the "Tools" menu is longer than
the default window height of the whole program. If I should
accidentally mouse over the encoding menu, it expands to fill the
whole screen and part of a second menu.
On a side note, what is the difference between KWrite and Kate? Or in
other words, when would I want to use KWrite instead of Kate?
Regards,
Robert.
On 21/07/06, Jaison Lee <lee.jaison at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/21/06, Benjamin Meyer <ben at meyerhome.net> wrote:
> > Now that KWrite can do bi-directional text is there any reason left to keep
> > KEdit (the application)?
>
> I know I tend to use it a decent amount because sometimes I just want
> something simple and most importantly: fast. I wouldn't die without
> it, tho.
>
> I suppose the most important question is: Is it actively maintained
> and what is his/her opinion? I show Bernd Johannes Wuebben as the
> current maintainer, and I'm cc-ing him into this conversation.
>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list