Pimpl copying

[Thiago Macieira]

André Wöbbeking wrote:
>On Friday 14 July 2006 18:09, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> André Wöbbeking wrote:
>> > Many pimpls were just changed to (nested) Private.
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand. There was a discussion about the
>> naming and as I could remember "Private" was not the favorite
>> name.
>
>In KDE 3 KFooPrivate was used in the same scope as KFoo. In KDE 4 it was
>changed to a nested  class KFoo::Private.

But that doesn't allow us to use the Q_DECLARE_PUBLIC, Q_DECLARE_PRIVATE, 
Q_Q and Q_D macros.


-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060716/c8e8c591/attachment.sig>