Pimpl copying

[Olivier Goffart]

Le vendredi 14 juillet 2006 20:38, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> On Friday 14 July 2006 11:35, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > Searching for "Private;" shows that the naming is totally inconsistent
> > in kdelibs. So the question is, must it be consistent? And if, which
> > name should be used?
>
> yes, it should be consistent. no, i don't think we should spend time
> discussing it on this list. there are people who feel one way, others who
> feel another ... it's almost purely personal aesthetic opinion. and
> opinions can (and will) be discussed (or argued) forever without
> resolution.

Althought my personal preferences goes to KFoo::Private, a technical reason 
has been mentioned against it:
The fact that KFoo::Private is exported with KFoo if KFoo has the KDE_EXPORT 
macro.

Anyway, this information need to be verified.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060715/4db44f3e/attachment.sig>