Pimpl copying

[Peter Kümmel]

André Wöbbeking wrote:
> 
> Many pimpls were just changed to (nested) Private.
> 

I'm not sure I understand. There was a discussion about the
naming and as I could remember "Private" was not the favorite
name.

>> +
>> +#define KDE_PIMPL_BASE_MACRO(COPY_ACCESS,X) \
>> +COPY_ACCESS: \
>> +    X(const X##&); \
>> +    X##& operator=(const X##&); \
>> +private: \
>> +    class X##Private; \
>> +    X##Private * const d;
>> +
>> +#define KDE_PIMPL_ENABLE_COPY(X)  KDE_PIMPL_BASE_MACRO(public, X)
>> +#define KDE_PIMPL_DISABLE_COPY(X) KDE_PIMPL_BASE_MACRO(private,X)
> 
> Does't KDE_PIMPL_DISABLE_COPY lead to unresolved smybols linking error 
> with MSVC (see "unresolved symbols from value.cpp/.h" on k-c-d from 
> 20.01.2006)?

Declaring as private should not lead to a linker error, but I've
not tested the mention case. Will have a look at it.