DBus/QtDBus Concerns

[David Jarvie]

On Thursday 13 July 2006 10:04, Will Stephenson wrote:
>On Thursday 13 July 2006 01:50, David Jarvie wrote:
>> KAlarm and kalarmd need to interact via D-Bus. If some other application
>> made certain D-Bus calls, alarms could be lost. So it seems a sensible
>> precaution to check the sender (just as was done in KDE 3 using DCOP).
>
>Would support for peer to peer dbus, on a private interface, help here?
>This is in the dbus spec but underutilised and implemented as yet

A private interface seems the ideal solution. Is this actually possible currently using the 
Qt D-Bus implementation?

--
David Jarvie.
KAlarm author & maintainer.
http://www.astrojar.org.uk/linux/kalarm.html