policy change related to kdelibs snapshots

Benjamin Reed rangerrick at gmail.com
Mon Jul 10 01:19:22 BST 2006


On 7/9/06, Benjamin Meyer <ben at meyerhome.net> wrote:

> Why not simply drop the snapshot libs?  Any major changes should have their
> own branch like liveui current has.  When big changes are intigrated it can
> be announced ahead of time that things will be broken for a day or two (some
> porting and testing should have already been done).  For any minor changes,
> the guys who commit to libs should port the rest of kde first.

Yeah, this is how we do development where I work and it's very
effective.  Trunk is always compilable, bugfixes and minor changes can
go in, but anything sweeping happens in a "feature branch" before
getting merged.

SVN makes it cheap, might as well take advantage of it.




More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list