is new lib dependency possible for 3.5.2?
Jakob Petsovits
jpetso at gmx.at
Mon Jan 30 18:29:32 GMT 2006
On Monday, 30. January 2006 19:05, Leo Savernik wrote:
> From a compilers point of view, yes. But we pay the full price. If we
> really needed the lib, ok. But there's no functionality in glib not already
> covered by the libstdc++/QtCore combo.
Even if so, libxklavier can't make use of this functionality because it's only
written in C. The question is therefore not whether libxklavier should depend
on libstdc++, because it can't. The question is which C library is the best
fit from a features vs. linking size point of view.
As far as I followed the discussion, the libxklavier maintainer is willing to
rethink his decisions, so if you know a C library that fits better than glib,
we're eager to know from you.
Regards,
Jakob
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list