is new lib dependency possible for 3.5.2?

[Jakob Petsovits]

On Monday, 30. January 2006 19:05, Leo Savernik wrote:
> From a compilers point of view, yes. But we pay the full price. If we
> really needed the lib, ok. But there's no functionality in glib not already
> covered by the libstdc++/QtCore combo.

Even if so, libxklavier can't make use of this functionality because it's only 
written in C. The question is therefore not whether libxklavier should depend 
on libstdc++, because it can't. The question is which C library is the best 
fit from a features vs. linking size point of view.

As far as I followed the discussion, the libxklavier maintainer is willing to 
rethink his decisions, so if you know a C library that fits better than glib, 
we're eager to know from you.

Regards,
  Jakob