is new lib dependency possible for 3.5.2?
staikos at kde.org
Mon Jan 30 18:29:40 GMT 2006
On Monday 30 January 2006 12:52, Leo Savernik wrote:
> > If lixklavier brings in glib, then I still fail to see the big deal. If
> > you want to complain about glib being heavy or something similarly silly,
> > just have a look at ldd of some KDE app one day. If you want to try
> > something like "chances of bugs in the lib being fixable by KDE
> > developers without needing barf bags", then you're already late too,
> > we've always had deps like that (does somebody know if George jumps when
> > he hears "OpenSSL"? I've never tried in person).
George cries when he hears that.
> Afaik, OpenSSL is now dlopened. If kxbd/whatever did the same with glib, I
> couldn't care less.
Yes it is. And the nice thing is that it's only loaded on-demand, and can
be easily removed at runtime. It's very nasty work though.
KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/
More information about the kde-core-devel