is new lib dependency possible for 3.5.2?

[Nicolas Goutte]

On Friday 27 January 2006 14:49, Andriy Rysin wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Stephan Kulow wrote:
> >>> If the feature is really necessary, then maybe you could just copy
> >>> over the relevant sections?
> >>
> >> Where did you read feature in what Andriy wrote? It's about replacing an
> >> own parser with a lib that does exactly that - and does it better as
> >> it's maintained by the same guy maintaining the xorg rule files these
> >> days.
> >
> > "Feature" maybe wasn't the right word. What I meant is if this new parser
> > is really necessary in the form of an external library, or at all.
>
> Well, Stephan got the point, the current parser in kxkb is quite ugly
(...)

> My rough estimation is by adding libxklavier and some code cleanups we
> could fix at least dozen of bugs in kxkb before 3.5.2.

Do you thing that you would need new user-visible messages? Many of them?

(...)
> Andriy

Have a nice day!