More crash-proof KCrash (was Re: Konq crash backtraces)

[Olivier Goffart]

Le Mercredi 11 Janvier 2006 17:40, Lubos Lunak a écrit :
>  This way KCrash should be more reliable and we should (hopefully) always
> get DrKonqi now. 

Even with infinite recursions ?

I've just got such crash previous twice this week, and no dr konqui, just 
segfault in the console.

(but i guess dr konqui should also strip the backtrace, like gdb does with
--- press enter to continue or q to quit ---)

--
Olivier

...
#11232321 0xb6851996 in foo::bar() from foo.cpp:123
#11232322 0xb6851996 in foo::bar() from foo.cpp:123
#11232323 0xb6851996 in foo::bar() from foo.cpp:123
#11232324 0xb6851996 in foo::bar() from foo.cpp:123
#11232325 0xb6851996 in foo::bar() from foo.cpp:123
#11232326 0xb6851996 in foo::bar() from foo.cpp:123
....

:-p

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060112/59f16df2/attachment.sig>