Waldo Bastian bastian at kde.org
Thu Jan 5 00:06:22 GMT 2006

On Wednesday 04 January 2006 11:08, Maks Orlovich wrote:
> >  * one for GCC 3.4/4.0 ABI
> >
> > In theory, the latter two should be identical (they both try to implement
> > the Itanium C++ ABI specification (go to
> > http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/ for a full documentation).
> In practice, even with identical versions of GCC, you'd find that many
> Linux distributions break the libstdc++ ABI.

Please be specific. Which distribution did break the ABI when and with which 
version of GCC? Vague statements like the one above tend to get repeated and 
gain alife of their own without any way to evaluate their truth.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060104/dc5f49c8/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list