Date/time class changes to handle extended date ranges
ruurd at tiscali.nl
Mon Feb 20 13:20:45 GMT 2006
On Monday 20 February 2006 12.15, David Faure wrote:
> Yes, go on until KAction and its relation to QAction (which was developed
> later on) : there is no relation between the two, except at a very high
> conceptual level. So the argument doesn't work.
At which point I say that that is the level from which newcomers start to
operate. I did not maintain it is a hard-and-fast rule. It /is/ a pattern
that quite quickly emerges.
> However Ruurd has a point: it would make sense that all KDate* widgets can
> actually work with KDate objects. If the APIs are similar then it shouldn't
> be too difficult to port them to KDate (and assuming there's a KDate(const
> QDate&) constructor, passing QDates to those widgets would still work.
I think we're trumped by:
R.F. Pels, 3e Rompert 118, 5233 AL 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
+31736414590 ruurd at tiscali.nl http://home.tiscali.nl/~ruurd
More information about the kde-core-devel