#include <Qt/someheader> not portable
frans.englich at telia.com
Sun Feb 5 17:07:56 GMT 2006
On Sunday 05 February 2006 00:56, Daniel Molkentin wrote:
> Am Samstag 04 Februar 2006 14:09 schrieb George Staikos:
> > You don't think we'll use <QtGui> in the end? Our experience with Qt4
> > so far has been that we include so many classes we might as well have
> > included the wrappers instead.
> Yes, I only use the by-class header files in headers. For implementations,
> I always use QtCore or QtGui, whatever is needed. it's way more convinient.
Does anyone know whether PCHs are efficient when it comes to reducing the
(typically) additional compile-time when using <QtGui>(etc)?
More information about the kde-core-devel