#include <Qt/someheader> not portable

[George Staikos]

On Saturday 04 February 2006 08:04, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > The documentation on doc.trolltech.com says "#include <QClassName>",
> > though.
>
> I think #include <QClassName> is the style we should promote to application
> developers. It's convenient and it does not require one to remember which
> module a certain class is each time one adds an #include statement.
>
> #include <QtModule/headerfile.h> on the other hand makes sense for
> installed library header files because it means that a user of the header
> file doesn't have to care about having the depending modules in the include
> search path.

  You don't think we'll use <QtGui> in the end?  Our experience with Qt4 so 
far has been that we include so many classes we might as well have included 
the wrappers instead.

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/